Implement task completion prompt and enhance progress handling
- Added logic to prompt users to mark tasks as done when progress reaches 100%, integrating with the socket events for real-time updates. - Updated backend functions to check task statuses and determine if a prompt is necessary based on the task's current state. - Enhanced frontend components to display a modal for confirming task completion, improving user experience and clarity in task management. - Refactored socket event handling to include new events for retrieving "done" statuses, ensuring accurate task status updates across the application.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -76,6 +76,25 @@ The parent task will be approximately 39% complete, with Subtask C having the gr
|
||||
- Only explicitly set weights for tasks that should have different importance
|
||||
- Weights are only relevant for subtasks, not for independent tasks
|
||||
|
||||
### Detailed Weighted Progress Calculation Example
|
||||
|
||||
To understand how weighted progress works with different weight values, consider this example:
|
||||
|
||||
For a parent task with two subtasks:
|
||||
- Subtask A: 80% complete, Weight 50%
|
||||
- Subtask B: 40% complete, Weight 100%
|
||||
|
||||
The calculation works as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Each subtask's contribution is: (weight × progress) ÷ (sum of all weights)
|
||||
2. For Subtask A: (50 × 80%) ÷ (50 + 100) = 26.7%
|
||||
3. For Subtask B: (100 × 40%) ÷ (50 + 100) = 26.7%
|
||||
4. Total parent progress: 26.7% + 26.7% = 53.3%
|
||||
|
||||
The parent task would be approximately 53% complete.
|
||||
|
||||
This shows how the subtask with twice the weight (Subtask B) has twice the influence on the overall progress calculation, even though it has a lower completion percentage.
|
||||
|
||||
## Time-based Progress Method
|
||||
|
||||
### How It Works
|
||||
@@ -108,6 +127,29 @@ The parent task will be approximately 29% complete, with the lengthy Subtask C p
|
||||
- Setting a time estimate to 0 removes that task from progress calculations
|
||||
- Time estimates serve dual purposes: scheduling/resource planning and progress weighting
|
||||
|
||||
### Detailed Time-based Progress Calculation Example
|
||||
|
||||
To understand how time-based progress works with different time estimates, consider this example:
|
||||
|
||||
For a parent task with three subtasks:
|
||||
- Subtask A: 40% complete, Estimated Time 2.5 hours
|
||||
- Subtask B: 80% complete, Estimated Time 1 hour
|
||||
- Subtask C: 10% complete, Estimated Time 4 hours
|
||||
|
||||
The calculation works as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Convert hours to minutes: A = 150 min, B = 60 min, C = 240 min
|
||||
2. Total estimated time: 150 + 60 + 240 = 450 minutes
|
||||
3. Each subtask's contribution is: (time estimate × progress) ÷ (total time)
|
||||
4. For Subtask A: (150 × 40%) ÷ 450 = 13.3%
|
||||
5. For Subtask B: (60 × 80%) ÷ 450 = 10.7%
|
||||
6. For Subtask C: (240 × 10%) ÷ 450 = 5.3%
|
||||
7. Total parent progress: 13.3% + 10.7% + 5.3% = 29.3%
|
||||
|
||||
The parent task would be approximately 29% complete.
|
||||
|
||||
This demonstrates how tasks with longer time estimates (like Subtask C) have more influence on the overall progress calculation. Even though Subtask B is 80% complete, its shorter time estimate means it contributes less to the overall progress than the partially-completed but longer Subtask A.
|
||||
|
||||
## Default Progress Method
|
||||
|
||||
If none of the special progress methods are enabled, WorkLenz uses a simple completion-based approach:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user